Skip to content
Grantmakers In Health
  • About
    • Staff
    • Board of Directors
    • Mission and Values
    • Join Our Team
    • Annual Reports & Form 990s
  • Our Work
    • Focus Areas
      • Health Equity and Social Justice
      • Access and Quality
      • Community Engagement and Empowerment
      • Philanthropic Growth and Impact
      • Population Health
    • Policy and Advocacy
    • Learning Communities
    • Strategic Plan
    • Strategic Guidance
    • Terrance Keenan Institute for Emerging Leaders
    • Awards
  • Publications
    • News and Updates
    • GIH Bulletin
      • GIH Bulletin Signup
    • Health Policy Update
    • Reports and Surveys
    • Grantmaker Profiles
    • Views from the Field
    • Issue Focus
    • Editorial Submission Guidelines
  • Events
    • GIH Annual Conference
    • Upcoming
    • Past Events
  • Resources
    • Trustee Resources
    • Philanthropy Careers
      • Submit a Position
    • Health Philanthropy Search
    • Directory of Philanthropy Consultants
  • Partner With GIH
  • Support GIH
  • Funding Partner Portal
  • Philanthropy Careers
  • Contact GIH
    • Funding Partner Portal
    • Partner Directory
  • Funding Partner Portal
  • Partner Directory
Sign In
Grantmakers In Health
  • Philanthropy Careers
  • Contact GIH
  • Bulletin Signup
  • About
    • Staff
    • Board of Directors
    • Mission and Values
    • Join Our Team
    • Annual Reports & Form 990s
  • Our Work
    • Focus Areas
      • Health Equity and Social Justice
      • Access and Quality
      • Community Engagement and Empowerment
      • Philanthropic Growth and Impact
      • Population Health
    • Policy and Advocacy
    • Learning Communities
    • Strategic Plan
    • Strategic Guidance
    • Terrance Keenan Institute for Emerging Leaders
    • Awards
  • Publications
    • News and Updates
    • GIH Bulletin
      • GIH Bulletin Signup
    • Health Policy Update
    • Reports and Surveys
    • Grantmaker Profiles
    • Views from the Field
    • Issue Focus
    • Editorial Submission Guidelines
  • Events
    • GIH Annual Conference
    • Upcoming
    • Past Events
  • Resources
    • Trustee Resources
    • Philanthropy Careers
      • Submit a Position
    • Health Philanthropy Search
    • Directory of Philanthropy Consultants
  • Partner With GIH
  • Support GIH
  • Funding Partner Portal
  • Philanthropy Careers
  • Contact GIH
    • Funding Partner Portal
    • Partner Directory

Beyond Goals and Strategies

Views from the Field
Posted May 11, 2017
VFF-Isaacs-Jellinek-May-2017-min
Morgan-Hynd
VFF - Isaacs/Jellinek - Beyond Goals and Strategie
Stephen L. Isaacs, JD, Co-Author, Foundations 101 and Principal, Isaacs/Jellinek
Paul S. Jellinek, PhD, Co-Author, Foundations 101 and Principal, Isaacs/Jellinek

Pay attention to implementation

The importance of having goals and strategies in philanthropy has been getting a lot of attention of late. But goals and strategies alone are not enough. Once a foundation decides on a goal and develops a strategy for achieving it, the next order of business is to implement that strategy and to monitor progress toward the goals. While foundations tend to spend a good deal of time (and often a good deal of money) developing their strategic plans, implementation often gets short shrift. This is unfortunate since poor execution of a good strategy is not likely to yield positive results, no matter how many hours and foundation dollars have been devoted to its development. (Of course, good execution of a poor strategy is no recipe for success either.)

One key requirement for successful implementation of a strategy is that it receives the full attention of the CEO and the board. All too often, there seems to be an assumption that, once the foundation’s goals and strategies have been agreed to, implementation is largely a mechanical process that can be left to program staff without much real discussion or follow-up. Indeed, board meetings often focus primarily on “new” business, with little time for discussion of ongoing programs. This tells the staff that program implementation is not really valued. The staff needs to know that the foundation’s leadership truly cares about effective implementation.

Monitor to stay on track

Closely related to effective implementation is the need for careful monitoring, both of individual grants and programs and of the strategy as whole. Are the grants meeting their specific objectives, and if not, is there anything the foundation can do to help get them back on track? Likewise, are the intermediate benchmarks for the strategy as a whole being met, and if not, are there any adjustments that the foundation needs to make—either to the strategy itself or to its timeframe—in order to achieve the desired goals? Foundations frequently rely on reports from the grantees themselves to monitor the progress of individual grants, but use existing data sources (such as government statistics) and independent evaluators to assess the progress of their overall strategy.

While monitoring can help a foundation determine how well its grants and programs are being implemented, it will not tell the foundation what impact those grants and programs are having or what lessons may be emerging along the way. Answering those questions will require an evaluation, which may be conducted by the foundation itself, by the grantee, or by an independent researcher.

Be clear about the purpose of evaluation

Evaluations vary greatly in terms of their scope, rigor, and cost. They may include everything from an informal qualitative self-evaluation carried out by the grantee to a randomized clinical trial conducted by an experienced independent evaluation researcher. In general, the more rigorous and credible the evaluation, the greater the cost and the greater the level of effort required. A foundation should think carefully about why it wants to evaluate a particular program before deciding on what kind of evaluation to support at the beginning of an initiative, not as an afterthought.

As a rule, if the foundation just wants a general sense of what was accomplished through its grant and is not trying to use the evaluation results to convince anyone else to replicate or learn from the program, an informal self-evaluation by the grantee may be sufficient. This is what many foundations do, especially with their smaller grants.

Evaluation as leverage

If, on the other hand, the foundation wants to leverage its investment in the program by convincing other funders to replicate the program on a larger scale, a more rigorous and costly independent evaluation may be required. The David and Lucile Packard Foundation invested almost two million dollars in a rigorous evaluation by Mathematica, a highly regarded independent evaluation research firm, of a model program to expand children’s health insurance that it was funding in Santa Clara County, California. The positive findings from that evaluation persuaded other California counties to adopt the Santa Clara model, and ultimately helped to leverage hundreds of millions of dollars in federal, state, local, and foundation dollars in increased coverage for children.

Interestingly, an evaluation does not always have to yield positive results to have a big impact. The documented failure of a particular intervention or strategy can itself serve as an important wake-up call to the field. A large-scale evaluation of an intervention funded by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in the late 1980s to improve end-of-life care for terminally ill patients found that the intervention had no real impact on patient care.

Instead of giving up on end-of-life care when the evaluation results were announced, the foundation intensified its efforts on the grounds that the evaluation had clearly revealed that ordinary interventions would not suffice. The foundation actively communicated the negative results of the evaluation to the public and to the medical profession as a kind of call to arms on the issue. Together with The Open Society Institute, it followed up with a multifaceted campaign to change deeply ingrained medical norms and values that has gradually resulted in widespread improvements in end-of-life care.

Timeliness matters

These and many other examples demonstrate the potential of evaluations to amplify the impact of a foundation’s programs. In addition, evaluations—even relatively low-cost, informal evaluations conducted by the grantees themselves—can yield valuable insights and lessons to the grantees and to the foundation itself.

Unfortunately, some evaluation reports—particularly those prepared by outside academics—are completed so long after the program itself has ended that the foundation has long since moved on by the time the final reports are submitted. As a result, too many potentially valuable evaluation findings languish unread in the closed-grant files of the nation’s foundations.

Focus Area(s): Philanthropic Growth and Impact

Related Topic(s): Governance and Operations
Share this

Newsletter Sign Up

Want to sign up for the GIH Bulletin? Click here to get on the list.

Explore Focus Areas

  • Health Equity and Social Justice
  • Community Engagement and Empowerment
  • Philanthropic Growth and Impact
  • Access and Quality
  • Population Health
  • Policy and Advocacy

Explore Topics

Access (287) Advocacy Strategies (244) Behavioral Health (201) Children and Families (212) Civic Engagement (150) Climate and Environmental Health (47) COVID-19 (146) Federal Policy (30) Governance and Operations (314) Health Equity (399) Healthy Eating and Active Living (160) Housing (20) Integrative Health (59) Journalism (5) Justice Reform (7) Messaging (9) Misinformation (12) Older Adults (137) Oral Health (54) Palliative Care (5) Policy Agenda (64) Public Health (6) Quality (189) Rural health (23) Social Determinants of Health (11) Trust-based Philanthropy (14) Trustee Resources (13) Violence Prevention (20) Workforce (17)

Join the largest national network of health funders.

GIH Funding Partners are a diverse constituency of over 200 informed, connected philanthropic organizations.

Join GIH
Navigation
  • About
    • Staff
    • Board of Directors
    • Mission and Values
    • Join Our Team
    • Annual Reports & Form 990s
  • Our Work
    • Focus Areas
      • Health Equity and Social Justice
      • Access and Quality
      • Community Engagement and Empowerment
      • Philanthropic Growth and Impact
      • Population Health
    • Policy and Advocacy
    • Learning Communities
    • Strategic Plan
    • Strategic Guidance
    • Terrance Keenan Institute for Emerging Leaders
    • Awards
  • Publications
    • News and Updates
    • GIH Bulletin
      • GIH Bulletin Signup
    • Health Policy Update
    • Reports and Surveys
    • Grantmaker Profiles
    • Views from the Field
    • Issue Focus
    • Editorial Submission Guidelines
  • Events
    • GIH Annual Conference
    • Upcoming
    • Past Events
  • Resources
    • Trustee Resources
    • Philanthropy Careers
      • Submit a Position
    • Health Philanthropy Search
    • Directory of Philanthropy Consultants
  • Partner With GIH
  • Support GIH
  • Funding Partner Portal
  • Philanthropy Careers
  • Contact GIH
    • Funding Partner Portal
    • Partner Directory
Contact

1100 Connecticut Avenue NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20036

202.452.8331

Email GIH

Press Contact

Annual Reports and Form 990s

Connect

LinkedIn

Facebook

Instagram

Youtube

Threads

Stay Informed

Sign up for the GIH Bulletin and other announcements

Search

© 2025 Grantmakers In Health | Privacy Policy

Website hosted by Yoko Co

Scroll To Top